Thread Info
  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 37 replies
  • Subscribers 10 subscribers
  • Views 5636 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Suggested
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Does any one know if XG is roughly at feature parity with the UTM yet?

R Hartes

Does any one know if XG is roughly at feature parity with the UTM yet?

Thanks

Richard.



This thread was automatically locked due to age.

Top Replies

  • in reply to dirkkotte +2

    That is correct. SFOS is far ahead of the feature set of UTM (from a security perspective). But it is based on the perspective, you are looking at. 

    SFOS has plenty of next generation features and security features, which UTM does not have.

    There are certainly some features, SFOS does not offer (yet) but UTM has. Some are explained here: IPv6 DHCPv6-PD, LetsEncrypt, some UI features. But for most of those scenarios, you could build some (better?) solutions with SFOS. For example LetsEncrypt could be usable with Wildcard Certificate integration with DNS providers. 

    But if Security and next generation features are interesting, SFOS is pulling ahead. MTR Integration, TLS1.3 Decryption, IPS Integration, Web Integration, Unified Firewall Rule set, Sync-Sec Security etc. 

    There are other features like XML Import/Export, which are one of the most powerful settings in SFOS. SD-WAN Routing, Central Integration etc. 

    Jump to answer