Hi,
regarding this thread, is there new features in version 19?
This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Hi,
regarding this thread, is there new features in version 19?
Hello Andrea,
I agree it's little bit confusing user interface. Let me try to answer your query.
If you have 2 WAN interfaces (WAN A 90d/18u and WAN B 25d/3u) then you should consolidate all bandwidth and set total bandwidth as 136Mbps (90+18+25+3). Think of it as one common aggregated WAN pipe.
After that, based on different type of traffic shaping policies like application/web/user/firewall, you can orchestrate and divide your aggregated bandwidth between desired traffic. Along with it, if you can orchestrate your traffic using SD-WAN or static routing to particular WAN interface, you can decide usage of your WAN ISP link. That's how you can guarantee SIP (or any other) traffic.
If as admin, one make misconfiguration in traffic shaping policy, it's possible you won't be able to achieve desired results (limiting some traffic or guarantying some traffic).
Hope it clarifies.
Regards,
Sanket Shah
Thank you for the suggest!
I thought about the zones solutions yesterday. Do you know if it's safe to associate a WAN interface to zone type LAN or DMZ?
Yes, it's safe (though may not look clean!) to use. You are not associating it with WAN interface actually. It's Gateway host property and applicable for outbound traffic only going via that WAN interface.
Regards,
Sanket Shah
Regards,
Sanket Shah
Senior Development Manager, Sophos Firewall
This is great!
Thanks, for the solution shared above!