Is it possible to get the hardware limitations removed for the home version? Or have they been removed in V18?
This thread was automatically locked due to age.
Is it possible to get the hardware limitations removed for the home version? Or have they been removed in V18?
In that speedtest are you using the IPS and Advanced protection? or just a bare fw rule?
Because I can max out a 3.6 GHZ processor with 3 cores 6 threads (virtualize) with IPS amd advanced protection at arround 400Mbps upload is much worse.
rfcat_vk Your sophos central account is bussiness or personal? what advanges do you have linking you fw to sophos central?
I have IPS and ATP enabled and can get that level of performance, it will depend on your underlaying architecture - the E5-2697v4 CPUs are fairly powerful.
2x cores of the E5-2697v4 gives the same level of performance as a i5-4400 (Going by CPU benchmark results)
BLS said:I thought the SFF does - or do you mean the Micro - as I presume the later and yes would be nice if that had a PCI-e slot on it - would be perfect...
Sorry, yes I was referring to the Micro.
Currently on a 70/20 Vodafone ADSL connection, just wanting Vodafone to pull their finger out for rolling out Gigafast more.
Using ESXi - was 6.5 and now 6.7 - 3 months time will be 7.0 - The VM has been assigned as 1 CPU with 2 core per socket - found the performance better that way.
So you're on AMD - hmm, I've seen strange things with AMD in the past under virtualisation - where the CPU seems to bog down and not give the full performance when shared between several VMs - so much so that I stick with Intel for any hardware replacement programs, just because I know it will work and work well..
Prob going to do a custom build using one of these processors into a m-itx board etc.
Hi,
it is personal, the history is kept for 7 days.
I setup the account during beta testing and it is still operational.
What advantages, for me none really, but I can comment on it in the forums when things are not correct or someone asks for advice.
CM does offer a couple reports the the native XG does not eg bandwidth usage.
Ian
You do get remote access to your XG without the exposing your external access, not that I need that anymore.
Ian
But both of those are different architecture - it's a bit like saying GIMP works fast on my machine, but PhotoShop doesn't...
The other thing to bear in mind is the way that machines handle network configuration - the CPU under certain conditions will take the hit at processing, where on Xeon processors it's more left to the hardware in the Network Card...
AMD used to be bad for this, and the CPU would load under heavy network traffic.
I would suspect that the Sophos XG is more at home on Intel platforms than AMD.
Don't get me wrong, AMD are good, but in the right circumstances - they are great for gaming machines, and general desktop performance.
My NIC are Intel i350 and they are passtrough to the VM so there is no emulation. These are enterprise grade nic and the HW offloading is disable you they are doing some work instead the CPU
What you are mentioning has nothing to do with the CPU but with the network card chipset
I have had VMs based on FreeBDS, Ubuntu and Centos and have always perform well, so maybe what it is not optimized is Sophos. I am using KVM and as far as I know Sophos is based on Ubuntu/debian